Belief Perseverance: Understanding Why People Hold onto False Beliefs
Library

The article explores the concept of belief perseverance and its impact on decision-making, problem-solving, and our perception of reality. This article delves into the psychological mechanisms that contribute to the phenomenon of belief perseverance.

Share this article
When nothing helps
Belief Perseverance: Understanding Why People Hold onto False Beliefs
Library 25.03.2023

Belief Perseverance: Understanding Why People Hold onto False Beliefs

Belief perseverance is a cognitive bias where people hold onto their initial beliefs even when presented with contradicting evidence. It is a powerful psychological phenomenon that can lead to the persistence of false beliefs, even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

This tendency to maintain beliefs is due to a variety of factors, including the desire to maintain consistency in one's beliefs and the fear of admitting that one's beliefs may be wrong. People may also experience cognitive dissonance when confronted with evidence that contradicts their beliefs, leading them to dismiss the evidence or seek out alternative explanations.

Belief perseverance has significant implications for decision-making and problem-solving, as it can lead people to make decisions based on faulty assumptions or incomplete information. It can also lead to the spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories, as people cling to their beliefs despite evidence to the contrary.

Understanding belief perseverance is essential for developing critical thinking skills and overcoming biases. By recognizing our own biases and actively seeking out information that challenges our beliefs, we can avoid falling prey to this cognitive trap and make more informed decisions. It is important to cultivate a growth mindset, acknowledging that we can always learn more and adjust our beliefs accordingly.

Why we have belief perseverance

Belief perseverance occurs because humans have a natural tendency to seek consistency and coherence in their beliefs and attitudes. When a belief or attitude is formed, the brain creates neural pathways that make it easier to retrieve that belief or attitude in the future. Therefore, when new information contradicts a held belief, the brain experiences cognitive dissonance, or the uncomfortable feeling of holding two contradictory beliefs at the same time. To reduce this discomfort, the brain may seek out new information that confirms the existing belief, reject information that contradicts it, or reinterpret the information in a way that fits with the belief. This process can lead to belief perseverance, where individuals hold onto their beliefs even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Belief perseverance can also be influenced by a number of cognitive biases, including confirmation bias, the tendency to seek out information that confirms preexisting beliefs, and the backfire effect, where attempts to correct false beliefs actually strengthen those beliefs. Additionally, social factors, such as group membership and identity, can play a role in belief perseverance. People may be more likely to hold onto beliefs that are shared by their social group in order to maintain social cohesion and identity.

Belief perseverance may have evolutionary roots

Belief perseverance may have evolutionary roots as it allows individuals to maintain their beliefs and resist challenges to them. In ancestral times, holding on to certain beliefs may have been crucial for survival, such as the belief in the effectiveness of a particular hunting technique or the danger of a certain predator. However, in modern times, belief perseverance can lead to holding onto false beliefs and resisting evidence to the contrary.

Belief perseverance can also be attributed to cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and self-justification. Confirmation bias is the tendency to seek out and interpret information that confirms one's existing beliefs, while ignoring or dismissing information that contradicts them. Self-justification is the tendency to rationalize one's beliefs and actions, even in the face of contrary evidence.


Overall, belief perseverance may have been adaptive in certain contexts in our evolutionary history, but it can be detrimental in modern times when it prevents people from updating their beliefs based on new information and evidence.